Stone v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
It is not contended by defendant on this appeal that there was error in the trial of this action with respect to the allegation that defendant was negligent in failing to exercise due care to stop its train, and thus avoid the injury to plaintiff's automobile, which was on defendant’s track when it was struck and injured by defendant’s train. The evidence in support of this allegation, although contradicted by evidence offered by defendant, was submitted to the jury under instructions which are free from error. Assignments of error based on exceptions to these instructions are not discussed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Austin v. . StatenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Bradley v. Ohio River & Charleston Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Goforth v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Price v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Cashatt v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937