In re the Marriage of Tough
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.
Husband appeals a supplemental judgment ordering entry of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO),1 contending that the trial court erred in its calculation of wife’s interest in his pension plan. Specifically, he contends that the QDRO divides his pension benefits in a manner that is inconsistent with the division provided for in the parties’ dissolution judgment. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand.
Husband and wife were married for just over 10 years, during which time husband was employed by Georgia Pacific. Husband’s employment provided him with a defined benefit pension…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In re the Marriage of NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- In re the Marriage of TileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- In re the Marriage of KiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lamm v. LammCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018