Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Tough

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 2013No. 850363; A150941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Husband appeals a supplemental judgment ordering entry of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO),1 contending that the trial court erred in its calculation of wife’s interest in his pension plan. Specifically, he contends that the QDRO divides his pension benefits in a manner that is inconsistent with the division provided for in the parties’ dissolution judgment. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand.

Husband and wife were married for just over 10 years, during which time husband was employed by Georgia Pacific. Husband’s employment provided him with a defined benefit pension…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re the Marriage of NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. In re the Marriage of TileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. In re the Marriage of KiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lamm v. LammCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API