Legal Opinion

Larson v. Jesson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 2014No. A14-0095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Judge.

We affirm the judicial appeal panel’s dismissal of appellant Hollis John Larson’s petition for a discharge or a provisional discharge from his commitment as a sexually dangerous person because Larson failed to introduce any competent evidence that he meets the statutory criteria for relief.

FACTS

After serving approximately 16 years in prison for convictions of sexual assault, Larson was indeterminately committed as a sexually dangerous person on July 28, 2008. Larson appealed his commitment, and this court affirmed. In re Civil Commitment of Larson, Nos. A08-1188, A08-1468,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Braylock v. JessonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Coker v. JessonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Coker v. LudemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Piotter v. SteffenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Jarvis v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Civil Commitment of KroppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. In re PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  4. Christopher R. Coker, (A15-1439, A15-1445), (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, (A15-1439), (A15-1606), Hennepin County, (A15-1445).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Steven DaywittCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API