McArthur v. Blondin
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal in Chancery. Heard at the September Term, 1911, Franklin County, Waterman, Chancellor, on defendants’ motion for the appointment of a master to ascertain and report the injunction damages, and for an order restoring defendants to the possession of the land in controversy. Motion granted, as recited in the opinion. The orators appealed.
1Per curiam
When this case was remanded — Blondin v. McArthur et al., 84 Vt. 516—such proceedings were had in the court of chancery that a decree was entered appointing a master to ascertain and report the injunction damages, and restraining the orators from delaying, hindering or preventing the defendants from taking and holding possession of the land and premises in question, “until the further order of court.” Without the defendants’ knowledge, an appeal was allowed-from this decree, which appeal the defendants moved to dismiss, but the motion was overruled.
It is admitted here that so much of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- Abbott v. SandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Taft v. Mossey's AdministratorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- Page v. Page's AdministratorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Saund v. SaundSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Vermont Savings Bank v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1913