Taft v. Mossey's Administrator
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appear in Chancery. Heard on demurrer to' the bill at the September Term, 1903, Chittenden County, Tyler, Chancellor. Decree pro1 forma overruling the demürrer. The ■defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHasEETOn, J.
The orator asks to have the will of Amable Mossey construed conformably to the provisions of No. 40, Acts of 1896. The cause was heard on demurrer, general and special, to the orator’s bill as amended. The demurrer was overruled pro forma and the bill adjudged sufficient. The cause was not further proceeded with in the Court of Chancery, but, without more, an appeal was taken to this Court. The decree rendered was, however, not final and the appeal did not lie. The cause remains in the Court of Chancery for further proceedings. Wright & Valley v. Creamery Co., 77 Vt. 17.
We see nothing in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wright & Valley v. Creamery Package Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- Page v. Page's AdministratorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Abbott v. SandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- McArthur v. BlondinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- Vermont Savings Bank v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1913