Legal Opinion · Concurrence

General Creditors of the Estate of Harris v. Cornett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1966No. 40274, 40384Published

1Concurrence

JOHN LADNER, Special Chief Judge

(concurring specially).

I concur in the result of the majority opinion in general and also in the result reached that this court has jurisdiction of this appeal, but I respectfully cannot concur in the following conclusion of fact and law in the majority opinion as a basis of jurisdiction of this appeal:

“All agree that if the Order of July 13, 1962 is to be interpreted as we have done” (to constitute, with the combined Journal Entry signed the same day, a new judgment as of that date), “the appeal was lodged within the time allowed by law * * * [and] this court…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ginn v. KnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API