Legal Opinion · Concurrence
General Creditors of the Estate of Harris v. Cornett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 4, 1966No. 40274, 40384Published
1Concurrence
JOHN LADNER, Special Chief Judge
(concurring specially).
I concur in the result of the majority opinion in general and also in the result reached that this court has jurisdiction of this appeal, but I respectfully cannot concur in the following conclusion of fact and law in the majority opinion as a basis of jurisdiction of this appeal:
“All agree that if the Order of July 13, 1962 is to be interpreted as we have done” (to constitute, with the combined Journal Entry signed the same day, a new judgment as of that date), “the appeal was lodged within the time allowed by law * * * [and] this court…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ginn v. KnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.