Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Papio Natural Resources District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1981No. 44057Published

1Opinion of the Court

313 N.W.2d 242 (1981)

210 Neb. 100

Donald J. DAWSON and Mina Pfeifley Dawson, husband and wife, Appellees,

v.

PAPIO NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT, Appellant.

No. 44057.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

December 4, 1981.

Paul F. Peters, Omaha, for appellant.

J. Thomas Rowen, Miller & Rowen, Omaha, for appellees.

Heard before KRIVOSHA, C. J., and BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, CLINTON, BRODKEY, WHITE, and HASTINGS, JJ.

CLINTON, Justice.

This is an appeal in an eminent domain proceeding making its second appearance in this court. The condemner, the Papio Natural Resources District, filed in the county court of Sarpy County a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Horton v. State ex rel. HaydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Application of Loup River Public Power Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Schubert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Keller v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API