Legal Opinion
State v. Harris
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 17, 2020No. 116515PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,515 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER M. HARRIS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT The residual clause "or any other dangerous or deadly cutting instrument of like character" in K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-6304 is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to provide an explicit and objective standard of enforcement. Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion filed January 19, 2018. Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JOHN J. KISNER, JR., judge. Opinion filed July 17, 2020. Judgment of the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- In re A.B.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- City of Wichita v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
- City of Wichita v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. KobachSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.