Legal Opinion

City of Wichita v. Trotter

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 25, 2020No. 121125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 121,125 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CITY OF WICHITA, Appellee, v. ARLANDO TROTTER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A challenged regulatory framework comes before the court cloaked in a presumption of constitutionality. This means that appellate courts presume statutes and ordinances are constitutional and must resolve all doubts in favor of their validity. The party asserting a constitutional claim must prove the law clearly violates the Constitution. 2. Whether an ordinance violates the Constitution presents a question of law over which an appellate court exercises…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Wichita v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. LettermanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API