City of Wichita v. Trotter
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
No. 121,125 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CITY OF WICHITA, Appellee, v. ARLANDO TROTTER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A challenged regulatory framework comes before the court cloaked in a presumption of constitutionality. This means that appellate courts presume statutes and ordinances are constitutional and must resolve all doubts in favor of their validity. The party asserting a constitutional claim must prove the law clearly violates the Constitution. 2. Whether an ordinance violates the Constitution presents a question of law over which an appellate court exercises…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Wichita v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
- State v. LettermanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021