Legal Opinion
Johnson v. City of Austin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 5, 1984No. 14092PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
John Johnson appeals from an interlocutory order of the district court denying his application for an injunction pendente lite. We will reverse the order and remand the cause to the trial court as explained below.
Johnson’s application for an injunction pendente lite formed part of his first amended original petition in a suit against the City of Austin and various City officials. The petition states the basic controversy between Johnson and the City: Johnson possessed three licenses issued by the City. The licenses authorized him to sell hot dogs from portable vending stands…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Camp v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Clear Lake Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thoyakulathu v. Brennan, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- City of Houston v. Northwood Municipal Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- State v. Operating Contractors, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Simon Property Group (Texas) L.P. v. May Department Stores Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.