Legal Opinion

John v. McNeal

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1911No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Ingham; Collingwood, J. Bill by Mosey John against Andrew J. McNeal and others for the specific performance of a land contract and an accounting. From a decree dismissing the hill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is a suit in equity brought by Mosey John, of Bay City, Mich., a Syrian, as complainant, against Andrew J. McNeal and Emily B. McNeal, of Lansing, Mich., who are impleaded with Joseph Moore, Elenora Moore, Frank Libby, and Harriet Libby, as defendants. The defendants McNeal appeared and answered complainant’s bill, and the rest of the defend*150ants appeared, but were defaulted for failing to plead, answer, or demur.

The object of the bill is to obtain relief from a forfeiture by defendant McNeal of complainant’s rights under a land contract, whereby the complainant purchased, on November 7,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Stickney v. ParmenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Durda v. Chembar Development Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Bilandzija v. ShiltsMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Drake v. LippmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Joseph Staszak (81-1476) and Richard Staszak (81-1462) v. Walter RomanikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API