Commonwealth v. Hoyt
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 117, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Co., May T., 1916, No. 29, of ouster in quo warranto proceedings, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ex relatione Thomas J. Lowell, v. J. S. Hoyt. Quo warranto to determine respondent’s right to exercise the office of Inspector of Weights and Measures for the County of Clearfield. The facts appear in the following opinion of Bell, P. J.: First.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 117, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Co., May T., 1916, No. 29, of ouster in quo warranto proceedings, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ex relatione Thomas J. Lowell, v. J. S. Hoyt. Quo warranto to determine respondent’s right to exercise the office of Inspector of Weights and Measures for the County of Clearfield. The facts appear in the following opinion of Bell, P. J.: First. On the 29th day of December, 1915, J. S. Hoyt was and had for sometime prior thereto been in the employ of Clearfield County Poor District as steward of the county…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below directing it to be entered.
2Cited by20 opinions
- Suermann v. Hadley, Treas. (White)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Watson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Georges Township School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Finley v. McNairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.