Traywick v. Gilkey
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
Complainants below, three in number, are county highway commissioners for Carroll County, elected for two years, in August, 1932, pursuant to provisions of chapter 662, Private Acts of 1931. They filed their bill to restrain defendants Murray Grilkey and Henry Betts, claiming appointment under chapter 579, Private Acts of 1933, from displacing complainants in their offices, on the ground that the act under which they claim title is unconstitutional. They charge (1) that the changes made by the new Act of 1933 -are colorable only, affecting in no fundamental the road law of 1931 for Carroll…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goetz v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Smith v. SellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Haggard v. GallienTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Holland v. ParkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Loring v. McGinnessTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Removal of ThaxtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Hall v. StricklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Black v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Keith v. BeasleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1941