Gidley v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The evidence as set out in the record is somewhat confusing as to whether the alleged confession was made before* the whisky was actually found at the house or afterwards. If the confession was obtained before the whisky was found, it should not have been admitted, because at that time the corpus delicti had not been proven. Braxton v. State, 17 Ala. App. 167, 82 South. 657.
The court in determining admissibility of a confession should be careful to ascertain that such confession proceeded from volition, and that it was not superinduced by any influence improperly exerted. If the confession in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carr v. State.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Meadows v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Braxton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- DeJarnette v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sumnar Robert Brewster v. Gary HetzelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Mahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Lindsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Orr v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- People v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.