Legal Opinion

Vito v. Inman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 2, 2007No. A07A0161, A07A0162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

George R. Vito, a podiatrist, performed a surgical procedure known as “limb lengthening” on several patients. Mark Inman, an attorney, sued Vito on behalf of one such patient, Sabih Kalidy, who alleged Vito committed negligence per se and medical malpractice in connection with the procedure. That case was settled. Inman also filed a negligence and malpractice action against Vito’s professional corporation, The Foot and Leg Centers of Georgia, P.C., on behalf of a patient named Watson.

Inman then began representing another client, Ghurjit Dhillon, on whom Vito had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Avnet, Inc. v. Wyle Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Allen v. Hub Cap Heaven, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Essex Group, Inc. v. Southwire Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Jaillett v. Georgia Television Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Sherwood v. BoshearsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Executive Excellence, LLC v. Martin Bros. Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. EarthCam, Inc. v. OxBlue Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  3. Heartwood Home v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Paramount Tax & Accounting, LLC v. H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Wood v. Archbold Medical Center, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API