Legal Opinion

Houbigant, Inc. v. IMG FRAGRANCE BRANDS, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 20, 2010No. Docket 10-361-cvPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants appeal from a judgment of the district court (Preska, Ch. J.) dismiss ing one of two cases that were consolidated for all purposes. See Houbigant, Inc. v. IMG Fragrance Brands, LLC, No. 09 Civ. 839, 2009 WL 5102791 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2009) (dismissing Case No. 09 Civ. 839). As we explained in Hageman v. City Investing Co., 851 F.2d 69, 71 (2d Cir.1988), “when there is a judgment in a consolidated case that does not dispose of all claims which have been consolidated, there is a strong presumption that the judgment is not appealable absent Rule 54(b) certification.” Federal Rule of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vona v. County Of NiagaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Arthur G. Hageman v. City Investing Company and the Home Insurance Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guggenheim Capital, LLC v. BirnbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Gullo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Berlin v. Renaissance Rental Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. McCullough v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API