Legal Opinion

Osborn v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 27, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Campbell, Chancellor.

The judgment appealed from is the result of a trial at Circuit, without a jury, upon findings of fact and law by the Circuit Court judge based upon a stipulation of facts.

The findings of fact and law so far as they are pertinent are these: That one Blackburne, the owner of a certain motor car gave permission and consent to one Elsa Bessinger, but not as his agent or servant, to operate the same, and while so operating it, and without being licensed as a driver by the State of New Jersey, the car while under her control came into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Maryland Casualty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Suydam v. Public Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. Doolan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co. v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Sneed v. Concord Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Gronquist v. Transit Casualty CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co. v. EdwardsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Crystal Point Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kinsale Insurance Company (085606) (Hudson County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API