Legal Opinion
Prosegur, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 18, 2001No. Consol. 94-08-00486PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff, Prosegur, Inc. (“Prosegur”), challenges the refusal of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) to reliqui-date certain jewelry entered at the port of Miami, Florida. 1 Prosegur contends that the imported merchandise should have been classified under subheading 9801.00.10, 2 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), free of duty, rather than under subheading 7113.19, 3 HTSUS. Merchandise classified under subheading 7113.19, HTSUS, is dutiable at 6.5% ad valorem. Pursuant to USCIT Rule 56, Customs requests dismissal of Court No. 95-10-01305…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Essex Manufacturing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Cutter & Buck, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Hanover Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- United States v. Titan Metals Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 2019