Legal Opinion
Newman v. Granger
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 17, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 9851PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
Findings of Fact. This is an action to recover income taxes allegedly unlawfully assessed and collected under the Internal Revenue . Code of 1939, as amended, 26 U.S.C.A.
At the pre-trial conference held pursuant to Rule 16, Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., it was agreed by .the parties, and , the Court so finds, as follows:
-1. Plaintiffs, Samuel A; Newman and Helen B. Néwman, are husband and wife.
2. The income taxes involved were paid to defendant who was then Collector of Internal Revenue for the 23rd District of Pennsylvania.. 3. Samuel A. Newman was a Lieutenant Commander…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sheild v. WelchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Ingram v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Ingram v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Haussermann v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- McComb v. TrimmerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buffington v. Continental Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Loe v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pifcho v. BrewerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Southern UtilitiesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1983
- Samuel A. Newman and Helen B. Newman, His Wife v. Stanley Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957