Legal Opinion

Stuyvesant Insurance v. Renaldo

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Tessler, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment.

In this action plaintiff insurer seeks reimbursement from defendant insured for the sum of $14,000 which the former paid out in settlement of an action to recover damages for personal injuries brought on behalf of one Cosgrove against defendant as owner of an automobile and his son as operator.

In his application for insurance defendant stated that there were no drivers in his household under the age of 25 years. In his moving affidavit on this application defendant avers that at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Peters & State Farm Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. World Wide Rent-A-Car, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sternberg v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API