Legal Opinion
Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. World Wide Rent-A-Car, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. Plaintiff brings this action for a judgment declaring that the defendant World Wide Rent-A-Car, Inc., is obliged to defend and to pay.
Plaintiff issued a family auto insurance policy to the defendant Peter Cattano. Defendant Lifetime Pools Equipment Corp. leased the subject motor vehicle from defendant World Wide, its owner. World Wide is self-insured. Consequently its coverage extends to the minimum standard requirements of the Insurance Law. The car was used by the personnel of Lifetime. Its president, the defendant Peter Cattano, permitted his infant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stuyvesant Insurance v. RenaldoNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Singerman Bus Corp. v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Standard Accident Insurance of Detroit v. SolomonNew York Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- White v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between Peters & State Farm Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Farmingdale Fire District v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Sternberg v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972