Legal Opinion

Edan Transportation Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1993No. 1005 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner, Edan Transportation Corporation (Edan) for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), entered April 8, 1992, which denied Edan’s petition to reinstate its certificate of public convenience.

Edan is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business located at 730 Ocean Parkway, Brooklyn, New York. Edan was authorized to operate three taxicabs in the city and county of Philadelphia.

Edan’s certificate of public convenience was cancelled on July 18, 1991, by an order of the PUC, for failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dehus v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lehigh Valley Power Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. SME Bessemer Cement, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Radell v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cresco, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API