Mauldin v. Lowery

Our Rules of Civil Procedure, apparently having been confusing to the bar as to the distinction between the “Specification of Points” relied on for reversal on error, required by Rule 111 (f), and the “statement of each point intended to be urged, required by Rule 115 (c), have been amended to eliminate specification of points, and now require, by Rule 111 (f), in lieu of the former requirements, that “each party in his brief in his summary of the argument required by Rule 115 (c) shall state clearly and briefly the grounds upon which he relies in seeking a reversal * *

Rule 115 (c) further…