Aldrich v. Travelers Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
This is a bill in equity for rescission because of alleged mutual mistake and unconscionableness of an annuity contract entered into between the plaintiff’s testatrix and the defendant, dated April 3, 1940, whereby for consideration of a single premium of $5,000 then paid by the testatrix, the defendant promised to pay to the testatrix the sum of $31.70 monthly during her life.
In addition to the consideration of the paid premium, the contract on its face purports to have been issued “in consideration of” an application signed by the testatrix and made part of the contract. In the application…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hecht v. BatchellerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Curtis v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BurnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Cavanagh v. Tyson, Weare & Marshall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Ogden v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Covich v. ChambersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC v. DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- LaFleur v. C.C. Pierce Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Davis v. Dawson, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.