Legal Opinion

Pribil v. Koinzan

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2002No. A-01-251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Lawrence Pribil sued Barton and Sandra Koinzan, Terry Held, and Genevieve Shaw (collectively the defendants) for damages that the Koinzans’ cattle did to Pribil’s mature com and soybean crops on several quarters of irrigated land. The Koinzans’ cattle escaped from Shaw’s land and went onto Pribil’s neighboring fields. A summary judgment on the issue of liability was granted, and liability is not disputed in this appeal. In Pribil’s operative petition, he sought $164,079.42 in damages, but the jury returned a verdict for only $34,920.60. Pribil alleges that the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nebraska Nutrients, Inc. v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. MessersmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FahlkNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Snyder v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pribil v. KoinzanNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. McGill Restoration v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API