Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller
Texas Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceGonzalez, Justice
I agree that the proper standard of appellate review is abuse of discretion. However, the court glosses over the fact that Mrs. Buller only brought forward a partial statement of facts.1 Mrs. Buller simply did not meet her burden of providing us with a sufficient record that shows that the trial court’s judgment requires reversal.2
Even if recast under the proper standard of abuse of discretion, Mrs. Buller’s complaint is still that the state of the evidence does not justify the trial court’s action. Generally, points dependent on the state of the evidence cannot be reviewed in the absence of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christiansen v. PrezelskiTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Lane v. Fair Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- McKinley v. DrozdTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Barnes v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.