Legal Opinion

State v. Watkins

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2017No. 20160392PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Eybon Watkins appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery and the district court imposed upon him a four-year mandatory minimum sentence as an armed offender. Although the court did not instruct the jury to make a finding whether Watkins possessed a firearm during the robbery, we affirm because Watkins invited the error.

I

[¶ 2] Watkins was charged with robbing a hotel in Bismarck during August 2015. The charge was a class B felony under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-01(2), which applies “if the robber possesses or pretends -to possess…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. RendeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. StudhorseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API