Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 4, 1859PublishedCited by 14 opinions

CASE 35 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL FROM RUSSELL CIRCUIT COURT. cited Lift. Sel. Cases, 223; 4 B. Mon., 229; 10 lb., 153; 3 Mar., 70. cited. Constitution Ky., art. 8, sec. 11; Rev. Stat., 614, sec. 5; Peters' C. C. R., 429 ; 1 Met., 138 to 145. cited chapter 14, Civil Code; Rev. Stat., 296, sec. 4; lb., 295, sub-sec. 8; Civil Code, secs. 532 to 538; 1 Met., 533.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Simpson

delivered tiie otinion of the court:

This action was brought by William F. Patterson, against James P. Miller and William H. Haynes, to recover damages *494for an alleged illegal seizure and sale by them of his personal property. The plaintiff stated in his petition that the defendant, Miller, pretending to be the sheriff of Russell county, when in reality he was not the constitutional sheriff of that county, unlawfully and without authority took into his possession and sold a sorrel mare, the property of the plaintiff; and that the defendant, Haynes, purchased said mare at the aforesaid illegal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rodman v. HarcourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hapgood v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Hermann v. LampeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Pence v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  5. Drew v. WakefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1865

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API