Legal Opinion

Marshall Durbin Co., Inc. v. Hartley

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 24, 1980No. Civ. 2389PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Hartley, sued the defendant, alleging that the defendant through its agents negligently killed plaintiff’s dog.

The District Court of Washington County entered judgment in favor of plaintiff. The defendant appealed by trial de novo to the Circuit Court of Washington County. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict. These motions were denied. A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and assessed the damages at $500. The defendant made alternative motions for a new trial, judgment notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Carlisle v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Mobile Press Register, Inc. v. PadgettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Koger v. Roden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Shumock v. BookerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winn-Dixie Store No. 1501 v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. McKinney v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Trapp v. VessSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API