Legal Opinion

United States v. Ashton

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington

Decided April 19, 1909No. 1,397PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Suit in equity to determine adverse claims to land situated in the rim of Tacoma Harbor between the line of high tide and deep water. Heard on the bill of complaint and the answers of the several defendants. Decree for the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

Upon the hearing of an application for an order referring this case to the master in chancery for the taking of evidence, the defendants by their solicitors contended vigorously that such reference is unnecessary, and the merits of the case were very fully presented as if the hearing had been upon the bill and answers of the defendants, and upon due consideration the court finds that the controversy involved is easily determinable from conclusions declucible from the pleadings, together with indisputable facts of general notoriety and public documents and records of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  5. Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Montana Power Co. v. RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  4. Duwamish Tribes of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  5. United States v. StottsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API