Legal Opinion
Moore v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 25, 1946No. 11281PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, officers of the State of Washington, appeal from decree, which after determining the boundaries of the Quillayute Indian Reservation, orders ‘‘That the said defendants [appellants] and each of them and all persons claiming through or under them are hereby permanently enjoined, restrained, and debarred from interfering in any manner with or asserting any jurisdiction or control whatsoever over fishing 'activities of members of the Quillehute Tribe of Indians in the Quillehute River, and the tidal waters thereof, as it flows through, borders upon, or touches…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Choctaw Nation v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.