Legal Opinion

State v. Monfred

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 13, 1944No. [No. 12, April Term, 1944.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.

The indictment in this case contains eight counts, each charging Robert Monfred and Bernard Caltrider, of Baltimore, with a violation of the statute forbidding the sale and other use of obscene publications. Code, 1939, Art. 27, Sec. 495.

An indictment for a statutory offense is sufficient if it follow's the language of the statute, and is sufficiently specific to inform the accused of the particular charge on which he is to be tried. State v. Coblentz, 167 Md. 523, 529, 175 A. 340; Richardson v. State, 175 Md. 216, 200 A. 362; State v. Petrushansky, 182 Md. 164, 36 A. 2d 533, 537. We find no…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Neusbaum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Tunstill v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State v. PetrushanskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Story v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Lambert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. 400 E. Baltimore Street, Inc. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API