Pollock v. Feinstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
McEWEN, P.J.E.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Sonya Pollock, appeals from the order denying her petition to strike the judgment of non pros entered in favor of appellees, Michael A. Feinstein, M.D., and Timothy F. Shawl, M.D., a judgment entered by the prothonotary after appellant failed to file a certificate of merit within sixty days of the filing of a complaint. See: Pa.R.C.P. No. 1042.6. We affirm.
¶ 2 This appeal arises from a claim brought by appellant against appellees for their alleged failure to obtain her informed consent to a procedure performed by ap-pellee, Dr. Feinstein, on September…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Womer v. HillikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Varner v. Classic Communities Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zokaites Contracting Inc. v. Trant Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Shinal, M. v. Toms, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Berdecia-Cortes, J. v. Rogers, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Bisher, B. v. Lehigh Valley HealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Surefire Dividend Capture v. The PNC FinancialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.