Legal Opinion

Varner v. Classic Communities Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 2006PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Justin P. Varner, Matthew B. Var-ner, Christopher R. Varner, and Danielle Canning (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), appeal from the January 11, 2005 order denying their petition to open a judgment of non pros that had been entered against them due to their failure to file a certificate of merit pursuant to the rules at Pa.R.C.P. 1042.1-1042.8, which apply to professional liability claims. We affirm.

¶ 2 A brief factual and procedural history follows. Plaintiffs filed a complaint on December 31, 2003, against defendants Classic Communities Corporation (“Classic”), Ronald…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Grossman v. BarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Hoover v. DavilaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Yee v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Merlini Ex Rel. Merlini v. Gallitzin Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Ditch v. Waynesboro HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. French v. Commonwealth Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Ferencz v. MedlockDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Merlini Ex Rel. Merlini v. Gallitzin Water AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API