Legal Opinion

People v. Freitas

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 2009No. C060280PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Following conviction of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)) 1 upon a no contest plea, defendant Tony Freitas appeals from the probation order (§ 1237), contending the trial court imposed two probation conditions that are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We shall modify both conditions and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In August 2008, defendant was charged with (1) grand theft (§ 487) and (2) second degree burglary (§ 459). Defendant entered a no contest plea as to the first count and a waiver under People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754 [159…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. JeffersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. BeltranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API