Fallon v. Dougherty
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Sixth District, County of Sacramento. This was an action of ejectment to recover possession of a lot of land in the City of Sacramento. The plaintiff deraigns title through one John A. Sutter and G. W. Hammersly. On the trial she, to lay the foundation for the introduction of secondary evidence, introduced one Stevens, who testified as follows: “ The plaintiff in this action was a resident of San Francisco county.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Sixth District, County of Sacramento. This was an action of ejectment to recover possession of a lot of land in the City of Sacramento. The plaintiff deraigns title through one John A. Sutter and G. W. Hammersly. On the trial she, to lay the foundation for the introduction of secondary evidence, introduced one Stevens, who testified as follows: “ The plaintiff in this action was a resident of San Francisco county. Witness was acting as her agent and attorney in fact, and was conducting this suit for her ; he had made search for the original deed from Sutter to Hammersly and…
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This case must be reversed for want of sufficient preliminary proof of the inability of the plaintiff to produce the original deed from Sutter to Hammersly, through whom she deraigns title to the premises in controversy, to authorize the admission of the record copy. The evidence introduced only shows a search by the agent of the plaintiff and inquiry of Hammersly. It does not appear that the plaintiff herself has not the possession or control of the original. Her affidavit, in the absence of other evidence, should have been offered on the point. Laws of 1857, chap. 254, sec. 2; Macy v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hensley v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857