Hopkins v. Cowen
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Dennis, J.) The verdict for the defendant assessed the value of the property replevied at $881.
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The appellant in this case sued the appellee in replevin to recover the possession of two hundred and ten sacks of flour. The pleas are, property in the appellees, and property in the Winnebago City Mill Company.
At the trial the appellant, to sustain the issues on his part, offered to prove, that he had been engaged in purchasing flour from the Winnebago City Mill Company for a number of years; that on January the nth, 1898, he ordered from the company the flour in question, “ without any agreement as to the terms of payment,” and that “ the flour was subsequently shipped by the said company…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Alderman v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Lamotte v. WisnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Hall v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Lochnar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Brent v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- F. W. McNeely & Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Richardson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.