Riley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVENPORT, 'J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Caddo county, Okla., on a charge of having possession of a whisky still for the unlawful purpose of manufacturing distilled spirits, and sentenced by the court to confinement in the county jail for 180 days, and to pay a fine of $500. Motion for a new trial, was filed and overruled, exceptions saved, and appeal perfected.
The evidence, in substance, is as follows: H. C. Diehl testified that he was the owner of the place on which the still was alleged to have been found; that the.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Willard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
- Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Polanka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Story v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948