Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1928No. A-6409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVENPORT, 'J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Caddo county, Okla., on a charge of having possession of a whisky still for the unlawful purpose of manufacturing distilled spirits, and sentenced by the court to confinement in the county jail for 180 days, and to pay a fine of $500. Motion for a new trial, was filed and overruled, exceptions saved, and appeal perfected.

The evidence, in substance, is as follows: H. C. Diehl testified that he was the owner of the place on which the still was alleged to have been found; that the.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Willard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  3. Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Polanka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Story v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API