Matter of Estate of Harrington
Wyoming Supreme Court
1DissentRaper, Justice
I believe we should get down to business and decide the issues as they ought to be decided rather than encumbering the judicial system and litigants with an unnecessary and improper duplication of effort and expense. For that reason I must dissent.
Because of the length of this dissenting opinion, I will at the outset summarize the reasons I believe the majority opinion reaches an erroneous result:
Part I. The rule espoused by the majority is not founded on any applicable Wyoming authority or any rule existing elsewhere. The parties to the “dispute” in this case are heirs, or devisees or…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Woods v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.