Legal Opinion

Commonwealth General Corp. v. York

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2005No. 04-0829PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, the trial court denied nonresident defendant Commonwealth General Corporation’s special appearance. The court of appeals affirmed the denial on the basis of specific jurisdiction. 141 S.W.3d 840, 843. We conclude that there is no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the plaintiffs’ causes of action arise from or relate to Commonwealth’s contacts with Texas and that the court of appeals erred in affirming the denial on the basis of specific jurisdiction. We remand the case to the court of appeals for determination of whether general jurisdiction exists.

Marguerite…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. American Type Culture Collection, Inc. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. GibsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Spir Star AG v. KimichTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Villagomez v. Rockwood Specialties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  3. Capital Finance & Commerce AG v. Sinopec Overseas Oil & Gas, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Kelly v. General Interior Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. TexVa, Inc. v. Boone, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API