Legal Opinion

Shemin v. A. Black & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.

Plaintiff sues for damages for breach of an oral contract. Defendant disputes plaintiff’s version of that contract; claims an oral contract differing in terms and in time of making and asserts thereon a counterclaim for commissions; contends that if, in fact, the contract as alleged by *1047plaintiff was made, (1) plaintiff, as inducement, promised to pay and did pay a sum of money to defendant’s employee, without defendant’s knowledge and consent, in violation of section 439 of the Penal Law; and (2) that it was beyond the scope, actual and apparent, of its employee’s authority, hence not binding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Sirkin v. Fourteenth Street StoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Griffith v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Barton v. Port Jackson & Union Falls Plank Road Co.New York Supreme Court · 1854

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Bankers Trust Company v. Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API