Legal Opinion

Honan v. Dimyan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 14, 2004No. AC 24085Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The pro se plaintiffs, William H. Honan and Nancy Burton, 1 appeal from the order of the trial court that the plaintiffs pay certain of the defendant’s costs, issued upon the denial of the motion to dismiss filed by the defendant, Joseph Dimyan. On appeal, the plaintiffs raise numerous claims. We dismiss the appeal without reaching the merits of those claims due to the lack of a final judgment.

We encounter yet again the continuing and contentious saga between these parties. See Honan v. Dimyan, 76 Conn. App. 906, 822 A.2d 373, cert. denied, 264 Conn. 919, 828 A.2d 617…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. ChowdhurySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API