Legal Opinion

Erskine v. DDOC Commissioner Claire Dematteis

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 19, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01017Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JUSTIN ERSKINE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 21-1017 (MN) ) C/O CLAIRE DEMATTEIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Justin Erskine, Georgetown, DE – Pro Se Plaintiff October 19, 2021 Wilmington, Delaware ee. Marge evsidt Plaintiff Justin Erskine (‘Plaintiff’), an inmate at Sussex Correctional Institution (“SCT”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (D.I. 1). He appears pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (D.I. 3). This Court proceeds to screen the Complaint (D.I. 1) pursuant…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API