Legal Opinion

Black & Veatch International Co. v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 3, 2002No. 00-2402-JARPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ROBINSON, District Judge.

This action arises out of the construction of the Hanfeng Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 (Project) in the Peoples Republic of China. Plaintiff Black & Veatch International Company (Black & Veatch) contracted with Defendant Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (Foster Wheeler) to design, supply and fabricate structural steel for the Project, in exchange for payment of $20,990,657. This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Foster Wheeler’s Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff and for an Award of Costs and Attorneys’ Fees to Defendant (Doc.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Linda Sue Archibeque v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Abbie v. Shasta CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. Beard v. County of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Beard v. County of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Brendan P. Connick and Riley Connick v. Western Concrete Pumping, Inc., et alDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
  5. Chaudhry v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API