Legal Opinion

Beard v. County of Stanislaus

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 17, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00841Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-DAD-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL THIRD PARTIES 13 v. STANISLAUS FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER AND C.A.I.R.E. CENTER TO PRODUCE 14 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., DOCUMENTS WITHIN 30 DAYS 15 Defendants. ORDER VACATING MAY 18, 2022 HEARING 16 (ECF Nos. 24, 25) 17 18 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s 20 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to compel third parties Stanislaus Family Justice Center 21…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Internet Solutions for Business Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Black & Veatch International Co. v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  5. Vigilant Insurance v. East Greenwich Oil Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API