Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1988No. 8714SC968PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to dismiss the charge of death by vehicle. Defendant’s remaining assignments of error concern the requirement in the trial court’s judgment that she pay restitution in the amount of $500,000 as a condition of her probation.

Defendant contends that G.S. 20-141.4(a2) is invalid under both the North Carolina and United States Constitutions because it imposes criminal liability without requiring a finding of criminal intent. General Statute 20-141.4(a2) provides:

Misdemeanor Death by Vehicle. — A person commits…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. State v. HazelwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. GuiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. RitchieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. State v. MucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API