Legal Opinion

Pomerantz v. Bryan Motors, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1949No. Civ. No. 16777PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Plaintiff's automobile having need of mechanical improvement, he left it with defendant’s service department. Upon his return several hours later he engaged in conversation with the mechanic who had made the repairs. While the workman was explaining that he had installed a new fuel pump he dropped the old one upon plaintiff’s great toe. Judgment was entered upon the verdict for plaintiff from which comes this appeal.

Appellant assigns as error the court’s ruling which excluded evidence of appellant’s maintenance of a waiting room for customers in order that it might argue that respondent as a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. People v. PatuboCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Newman v. Fox West Coast TheatresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. People v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API