Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. City of Brecksville v. Husted

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2012No. 2012-1545Published

1DissentO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 19} I respectfully dissent.

{¶ 20} This case raises an important constitutional question regarding the scope of the right of initiative established by the Ohio Constitution, Article II, Section If, which provides:

The initiative and referendum powers are hereby reserved to the people of each municipality on all questions which such municipalities may now or hereafter be authorized by law to control by legislative action; such powers shall be exercised in the manner now or hereafter provided by law.

Section If thus sets forth an important limitation on the people’s reserved power of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. State ex rel. City of Upper Arlington v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Gateway Green Alliance v. WelchMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API