Legal Opinion
City of St. Louis v. Treece
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 1973No. 35089PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Defendant was found guilty by the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction of hindering, obstructing and interfering with a St. Louis Police Officer in the discharge of his official duties under Section 768.010 of the Revised Code of the City of St. Louis.
Defendant has urged that if any interference, obstruction or hindrance occurred, it was while the police officer was unlawfully arresting defendant’s wife and son; hence it was improper to punish defendant for coming to the aid of members of his family who were being illegally arrested.
Defendant appealed his conviction to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- State v. PetrechkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- United States v. Robert Frederick Linn and Martha J. LinnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kansas City v. LaRoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State v. NunesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Glover v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- People v. WessMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MontesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.