Commonwealth v. Mumma
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentNix, Justice
The introductory clause of Section 3126 coupled with subsection (1) sets forth the traditional crime of indecent assault. This crime traditionally required an assault and battery, including the elements of force and absence of consent. The essence of the offense was the taking of indecent liberties against the will of the victim.
The majority correctly states the concern of the drafters in enacting subsection (1) of Section 3126.
Section 3126 is derived from section 213.4 of the 1962 Model Penal Code. An earlier draft of that provision made indecent contact punishable in any instance where the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SparrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. GregorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth v. ShrodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.